The Supreme Court Ducked Another Big Abortion Case. Clarence Thomas Is Livid.
For nearly three years, it has seemed inevitable that the Supreme Court would strike down the “buffer zones” that restrict protests near the entrances of reproductive health clinics. A majority of the court has already castigated these laws—and past precedent upholding them—as a subversion of anti-abortion protesters’ First Amendment rights.
The Root on MSN1d
Oh Lord, Republicans are Pushing for a Clarence Thomas Statue, But Here’s Why This Should Never HappenAs Republicans are enjoying their majority in both the House and Senate, they are also pushing forth their own (questionable) ...
The Christian Post on MSN5h
Supreme Court declines to hear challenge to abortion 'bubble zone' law as city quietly repeals itThe United States Supreme Court has declined to hear a case that could have led to the reversal of a decades-old decision ...
In its most recent False Claims Act decision, the US Supreme Court opted for a narrow “claim” definition analysis, limiting its impact to ...
Democrats have long opposed honoring Thomas, a Georgia native who was accused of sexual harassment during his 1991 confirmation hearing.
The Court refuses a case on ‘sidewalk counseling,’ over a vigorous dissent.
The court decided not to take the case brought against the government by an Air National Guard member who was paralyzed ...
The Supreme Court on Thursday appointed a former clerk to Justice Clarence Thomas to argue in a case involving the application of the federal laws governing post-conviction relief for federal ...
The Trump administration fired Hampton Dellinger, head of the Office of Special Counsel, who sued to overturn the decision.
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results
Feedback