The Supreme Court Ducked Another Big Abortion Case. Clarence Thomas Is Livid.
For nearly three years, it has seemed inevitable that the Supreme Court would strike down the “buffer zones” that restrict protests near the entrances of reproductive health clinics. A majority of the court has already castigated these laws—and past precedent upholding them—as a subversion of anti-abortion protesters’ First Amendment rights.
The Christian Post on MSN4h
Supreme Court declines to hear challenge to abortion 'bubble zone' law as city quietly repeals itThe United States Supreme Court has declined to hear a case that could have led to the reversal of a decades-old decision ...
The Supreme Court refused Monday to take up a First Amendment case to revisit a previous ruling enshrining abortion clinic ...
The Supreme Court gave an Oklahoma death row inmate a new chance in the high-profile 1997 murder case. Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito dissented.
The Root on MSN1d
Oh Lord, Republicans are Pushing for a Clarence Thomas Statue, But Here’s Why This Should Never HappenAs Republicans are enjoying their majority in both the House and Senate, they are also pushing forth their own (questionable) ...
The US Supreme Court has once again refused to overturn an oft-criticized rule that bars soldiers from suing the federal ...
The Court refuses a case on ‘sidewalk counseling,’ over a vigorous dissent.
The U.S. Supreme Court avoided deadlock with a fractured 5-3 decision to give Richard Glossip, the Oklahoma death row inmate ...
The court decided not to take the case brought against the government by an Air National Guard member who was paralyzed ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback